![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgtYLxoc25UtahBEHuoiTrO9EuH1kXjm53SNYsVaRIJY85Ga6L5UZVACc3zvLUHyE8wvYYaO1ChABY-jWdVwM6xzh-nCKaslNtG-gpRUhPnly-S2QZJJh1zKSw1Zd_RJ6DfSPjV/s400/AirportUnderwear.jpg)
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi854k4VBjitimq9LXgoS2KC_8dy3KGfbdfHfxO9tUuh8qqQ9YFCSlAgHs9f6qomqyAJkFueuzbiBwrvbvNzlkhjGmmBVHWXcg-nQFyqlx9fzNERkzqMqKNDszEoN-n_KAT8LXG/s320/airport_xray_scanner.jpg)
NO. I would rather have dangerous invasive x-rays that show me naked. This would not be an invasion of my privacy or violation. I am willing to sign a waiver of any civil rights or health liability.
[VOTE NOW] Note the "Please, NO Jokes" signage at the TSA security check in the San Diego airport. Also note the gun and explosives exposed by the x-ray scan. As with the "Underwear Bomber", a gun could be concealed behind those pink briefs. However, it can not be assumed that a bulging protrusion is a gun. What happens if the person is not wearing any underwear?
5/24/10 Update: It seems most prefer other passengers at the gate see them naked than to be in their underwear.
27.5% Yes. It can help protect many lives.
62.5% No. I would rather have invasive x-rays that show me naked.
How do you stand? Clothed or less? You can vote here also: Click A for yes or D for no.
No comments:
Post a Comment