data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f7e9b/f7e9b038af4c1ec631350c6002c2fe489fe4c212" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6dfa8/6dfa8aa7ffb36742f5ff3269ff2bf8caac4735e7" alt=""
NO. I would rather have dangerous invasive x-rays that show me naked. This would not be an invasion of my privacy or violation. I am willing to sign a waiver of any civil rights or health liability.
[VOTE NOW] Note the "Please, NO Jokes" signage at the TSA security check in the San Diego airport. Also note the gun and explosives exposed by the x-ray scan. As with the "Underwear Bomber", a gun could be concealed behind those pink briefs. However, it can not be assumed that a bulging protrusion is a gun. What happens if the person is not wearing any underwear?
5/24/10 Update: It seems most prefer other passengers at the gate see them naked than to be in their underwear.
27.5% Yes. It can help protect many lives.
62.5% No. I would rather have invasive x-rays that show me naked.
How do you stand? Clothed or less? You can vote here also: Click A for yes or D for no.